General Secretary ballot – Don’t moan ‘bout the leader if you don’t bother to vote

Members will soon receive their ballot papers to vote for the person they want as the next General Secretary of UCU.

Sadly, turnout for UCU leadership and committee elections has historically been notoriously low.

I know that not all members and colleagues here understand the union’s structures, or know what many of the official union roles involve. Some think that it doesn’t matter who runs the union. Others simply forget to vote and putting a cross on ballot paper is often just one more thing that falls off the to do list in an already overloaded week.

But this vote really does matter.

The Post-16 Education sector faces a huge number of challenges. In Universities the hostile external environment includes REF, TEF, Brexit, proposed changes to fees, the demographic drop off in the 16-18 year old population, and seemingly endless league table ‘wars’. UCU continues to fight to defend our USS pension, and we urgently need to improve pay and equality, and address excessive workloads. At Southampton we will soon have a new VC, and potentially more change, after years that have seen several reorganisations, staff and budget cuts, redundancies, increased workloads and plummeting morale.

Now more than ever we need a strong union and we need a General Secretary who can lead the union through the ‘perfect storm’ in further and higher education.

The election of the next General Secretary of UCU is a chance for you to have a voice in the democratic process of our Union. We do not get the chance to vote for the VC or Vice-Presidents of our University, but we can have a say in who leads our union.

There are 3 candidates standing to lead UCU. Our branch has invited them to meet members here and, if they are able to come here, we will let you know as soon as dates/times are confirmed. Your branch executive have taken the decision not to endorse an individual candidate, but to encourage you to look at the candidate statements and social media to inform your decision.

We know that when it matters you get the vote out. In the USS dispute your votes gave UCU a mandate to strike. This vote matters too. Please use yours to select our next General Secretary.

Check your mail box for your ballot paper and look out for further details about the hustings.

Candidates (in alphabetical order)

Jo Grady
Web: https://grady4gs.com/
Twitter ‎@DrJoGrady
FB: https://www.facebook.com/Grady4GS/
email: grady4gs@gmail.com

Jo McNeill
Web: https://jomcneillucu.wordpress.com/
Twitter ‎@JomcneillUCU
FB: https://www.facebook.com/votejo4gensec/
email: j.mcneill@liverpool.ac.uk

Matt Waddup
Web: www.medium.com/unite-to-win
Twitter: @mattwucu
FB: www.facebook.com/matt.waddup.1
email: mattwucu@gmail.com

Southampton UCU join SUSU at anti fees demo

UCU members joined students and staff outside the Hartley Library and Building 37 at the Southampton Students for Education event to mark David Willetts’ visit to Southampton to “shamelessly publicise his book entitled ‘The Pinch: How the baby boomers took their children’s future and why they should give it back’.”

Willetts agreed to come out to meet us, so students and staff put some searching questions to him regarding government policy on fees and university funding. (His answers were less than convincing).

Catherine Pope from Southampton UCU talked about UCU’s concerns about privatisation and fees – the text of her talk is provided below:

“I’m here on behalf of UCU – the University and College Union – the largest trade union for staff in the post 16 education sector in the UK.

We have 120,000 members in FE colleges, Universities, Agricultural Colleges, Prisons and Adult education. We are educators, researchers, librarians, technicians, IT staff and administrators. We work in different places but what UCU members have in common is that we are passionate about education.

This country has University education and research that is the envy of many other parts of the world. We deliver far more with fewer resources than many of our competitors. This government is systematically cutting investment in Universities. Worse than that David Willetts desperately wants to privatise higher education because of his misguided belief that markets make everything better.

David Willetts wanted to remove the barriers to private companies in higher education. He wanted private companies like Kaplan and Pearson to give out degrees. These for-profit organizations already have a grip on education in the US.  For-profit higher education in the US is poorly regulated but has access to lucrative publicly subsidised loans. These companies target poorer communities and they sell their education with the promise of fixing the students up with loans. They hire part-time staff – often not academics – teach predominantly online, and deliver a very narrow range of vocational courses. This nets the companies huge profits.

But it is not higher education. It is not even cheap. A US Educational Trust report showed that it costs more than twice as much to enrol at a for-profit college as it does to in a public institution. Average debt for such these students is over $30,000 compared to less than $8000 at public institutions. Graduation rates are low – 22% compared to 55% in public institutions.

I am delighted that plans to allow private for-profit companies access to publicly-subsidised student loans here have been shelved at least until 2015. UCU led the campaign against these proposals in the higher education bill. 500 academics wrote to the Telegraph in December calling on the government to scrap the plans. Collective action, demonstrations like this one, matter. They show this government that we oppose their polices to privatise education. If we act together we can stop them.

Apparently the Lib Dems were especially unhappy with the proposals to let for-profit providers into higher education. They voiced their concerns in an early day motion in the House of Commons. Perhaps they acted for fear that the general public will never vote Lib Dem again because of their failure to stand by their promises on higher education.

Which reminds me why I am really really angry with David Willetts and his Tory-led government and their Lib Dem partners.

Student Fees.

The lifting of the fees cap from October means students here will pay £9000 a year to study for a degree. These fees are the third highest in the world (only USA and Korea pay more). Our students will leave their studies with an estimated £50-60,000 debt.

We have seen applications drop nationally and locally. High fees mean that people will be denied the life changing, enriching and rewarding experience that I was privileged to receive (and which Willetts and Cameron and Clegg had). Young people from this City who happen to be from poorer families will not go to University.  Mature students – people who lost their jobs thanks to Southampton Council cutbacks or the retrenching of local businesses – will miss a chance to upskill or retrain. This University will be poorer for missing out on developing those minds for the future.

UCU are against £9000 fees for higher education.

This ‘new’ fee income isn’t extra money. These fees simply replace the money the government took away from the University block grant. Every University is having to try to deliver more with less money. This means cuts to degree programmes (Sports Education, undergraduate Social Work have been lost here). It means cuts to jobs (we lost 200 jobs to voluntary redundancy last year).

Higher tuition fees will not deliver more, or better, education.

This government is taking away opportunities for the next generation and generations after that.

David Willetts please go back to your colleagues in government and tell them what you have seen today. A great University. Brilliant staff and students.

Privatisation and high fees will destroy everything you have seen. Please stop.

 

‘Come Clean’ NUS day of action on March 14th.

The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts is calling for maximum turnout for ‘Come Clean’, the NUS day of action on March 14th.

In London, assemble at ULU at 2pm:  https://www . facebook . com/events/193707544066925/

Here’s a blogpost about what you can do on your campus on the day:  http ://anticuts . com/2012/02/18/walkout-14th-march/

Under the new fee regime students will face a lifetime of debt. Despite calls from MPs to delay changes to the university admissions process, he has gone ahead with plans that will favour better off students at entry and force universities into ruthless competition for places with each other. Some universities will go to the wall as a result.

The government wants to drive down costs to make it easier for private companies to feed off public education – this is why staff are fighting to defend their pensions.

Willetts’ plans for higher education are modelled on Andrew Lansley’s plans for the NHS. So far, over 20 000 people have signed a ‘no confidence’ motion in Willetts. The withdrawal of his Higher Education Bill shows that even the government lacks confidence in him.

The National Union of Students has called for a national day of walk-outs on 14 March. This is an opportunity for staff and students to rally to the defence of our education. The government is vulnerable to pressure – now it’s time for all those who are opposed to the marketisation of education to call for Willetts to go.

Don’t turn back time: women and the cuts – 19 November 2011

This is an edited version of a talk given by Catherine Pope, Southampton UCU Equalities Rep to the Southampton Feminist Society and Socialist Society event for the Fawcett Campaign to ask the government ‘Don’t turn back time on women’s equality’ on 19th November.

I am a Feminist. I am also a Mother (to three boys aged between 9 and 20). I am a Professor at the University of Southampton – so I am variously a scientist /academic / educator / researcher. If you want specifics, I am a sociologist who studies health care organisations and teaches health professionals and a Web Scientist studying the world wide web and co-directing a major doctoral training programme here at the University.
I am also a Trade Unionist. I have been member of UCU (University and College Union) since its creation and before that of the Association of University Teachers – its predecessor – since the late 1980s. I am currently the Equalities Officer for the local branch and region. I am an activist. I haven’t always been one but I find, contrary to the usual political trajectory, which has people tending to get more conservative with increasing age, I am becoming more radical as I get older. (I am 45 now so goodness only knows what I’ll be like when I’m 80 if I go on like this). I have become more radical and I have been radicalised. In my 20s my activism was focussed on the peace movement – marching with CND, and of course, as a student in London the 1980s, defending free education and fighting for the Greater London Council. Over recent months I have become closely involved with the anti-cuts movement – notably UK Uncut. In fact this week I have been supporting some inspirational people involved in the UK uncut non-violent action in Fortnum and Mason’s earlier this year. I am, and continue to be, passionate about defending education – particularly post-16 education: that is higher education in Universities like this one and further education for 16-19 year olds in our colleges, and other forgotten areas such as adult education, prison education.
Of all the labels I might use for myself, Feminist is the most important. Without it I would not be here. I do not think I could have achieved any of the other things without Feminism and importantly I could not have done it without Feminists. (and I must be clear that I do not only mean women, though many women have been important to me on this journey. I include here the numerous men who have supported and inspired me.)
The Fawcett Society has a vision “of a society where women and our rights and freedoms are equally valued and respected and where we have equal power and influence in shaping our own lives and our wider world.”

So I’d like to talk briefly about three ‘equal’ rights. Firstly, as we are in here in the University, I thought I would talk about the right to education. I have had a life changing educational experiences, notably at Lewisham College and North East London Polytechnic (now University of East London) where I first studied sociology and learned to think differently about the world. I learned to question why things are the way they are. I learned to see gender and roles as socially constructed rather than given, to see that inequality is often manmade. Had I been born 100 years earlier I would not have had the chance to access education. I was the first in my family to study for a degree. In 1878 the first London university admitted women to its degrees, and even for a long time after that women were still expected to be wives and mothers, not doctors or geographers or lawyers. Women’s access to education was not given to them. It was won in a long political struggle. A political struggle which some of our sisters across the world have not won. According to a United Nations report women in two out of three countries in the world have unequal access to primary and secondary education. For every 100 boys not attending school, there are still 117 girls in the same situation.
I had a free education. I did not have to pay the kinds of fees currently expected from students and I did not leave higher education with the kind of debt facing many of the young women who will study here in coming years. UK students starting university in 2012 are likely to graduate with debts of well over £50,000. Alan Bennett a few years ago said
I believe that all students should have the same access to education as I did. But it just doesn’t happen now because students have to pay for the university tuition their academic achievements have brought them. I don’t claim to know how higher education should be paid for; all I know is that it’s morally wrong to expect students to get into debt”
That sense – that it is morally wrong to charge for higher education – is why I along with many members of my trade union UCU joined the NUS last year for the national demonstration – Fund Our Future: Stop Education Cuts and why we in UCU continue to oppose fees.

Secondly I have grown up with the right to vote. This right was won for me by other women and men who protested and fought and sometimes lay down their lives to win suffrage. Again this right is not shared by all women across the world. And whatever I might feel about the political parties on offer I cherish my vote and use it. Each time I do it is a small repayment of the debt to those that fought for my right to participate in the political process.
The third and final right I want to talk about takes me back my sons. I mentioned earlier that I am a Mum to three boys. They are a delight and amazement to me. I think they might also be feminists like their Dad. As well as being a Mum I also have a career. My choice to have children and work is a choice which the women who came before me could not make. My dear mother in law – the first in her family to go to University, who studied at Oxford and trained as a teacher, left her teaching job when she had her first child. Her own mother had to leave work on marriage. The activists and feminists of the 1960s and 1970s fought for the right of married women and mothers to work, for affordable childcare, family friendly employment policies, and for equal pay and opportunities. It is not easy combining paid employment and parenting. But I have had that choice. That right. And I also have the choice – a personal choice – about controlling my fertility via contraception or abortion. Having children or not. Having a career. Combining the two or not as I choose. These are rights and choices which all women should have – no matter where they live.
I feel privileged that I have had the opportunities I have had. And there is certainly more equality for women in my lifetime than for those in the preceding generations. I have equal rights – to vote and to be educated. I know this gives me a lot more opportunities than many women in the developing world. If I had been asked here just to celebrate feminism and its achievements I would stop there. But I am afraid you will have to listen to me a bit longer. Because I think that the policies of the current government will turn back time on women’s equality. The cuts to public services being made now disproportionately affect women. The Fawcett Society has called the way the cuts affect women a ‘triple jeopardy’ because

1. Women will be hit hardest by job cuts in the public sector
2. Women will be hit hardest as the services and benefits they use more are cut
3. Women will be left ‘filling the gaps’ as state services are withdrawn

Let’s look at some of the ways that the cuts are hitting women.

  • Women’s unemployment is now at its highest in more than 20 years – there are 1m women unemployed.
  • 65% of public sector workers are women; almost a quarter of working women are in public sector jobs so they will be more heavily hit by the public sector pay freeze and the projected 600,000 job losses.
  • Of the nearly £8bn that the government wants to raise by 2014-15, nearly £6bn will be taken from women.
  • Cuts to legal aid of £600m per year for people facing issues relating to divorce, housing, employment, immigration, debt and welfare benefits will hit women hardest, according to the government’s own equality impact assessment.
  • Child benefit has been frozen for the next three years. As 94% of child benefit recipients are women, of the £975m saving from child benefit £913m will be taken from women.
  • The health in pregnancy grant was abolished this April. The Sure Start maternity grant will now only be paid for the first child.
  • Child tax credit changes will cut the income of many families.
  • Changes to state and public sector pensions will disproportionately affect women – who already make up 2/3 of the UK’s poorest pensioners.

Despite a raft of equality legislation women are often treated worse than their male counterparts. Nearly 40 years since the Equal Pay Act women working full time across the UK still earn on average 15.5% than men working full time. According to the 2011 National Management Salary Survey, men continue to be paid more on average than women doing the same jobs (£42,441 compared to £31,895). Despite laws to protect them 30,000 women lost their jobs in 2009 as a result of being pregnant.
This government is doing nothing to address inequality. Their policies are making it worse. The Fawcett Society suggested that we dress up for this tea party in 1950s clothes because today’s event says ‘Don’t turn back time’. Our grandmothers and mothers alive in the 1950s lived with austerity – after WWII. But they could look to the newly created NHS when they were sick and to widening access to free education. They were on a journey that would take them through the women’s liberation and equal opportunities movements that would improve their lot. We’ve come such a long way. Let’s not turn back now.